Skip to main content
Comparison

Machina vs Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE is a popular open-source virtualization manager. Machina targets teams that outgrow a cluster and want a fleet, an EC2-style API and enforced network security.

MachinaProxmox VE
BaseYes. KVM/libvirt, Rust services, React UIDebian, KVM, LXC, ZFS, Ceph
Built-in storagePartial. Atlas for Ceph/NFS/ZFS; local and NFS poolsZFS and Ceph integrated in the installer
ContainersPartial. Podman/Docker (Vessel); no LXCLXC built in
Multi-host scaleYes. Controller fleet with DB (SQLite or PostgreSQL)Corosync cluster; Datacenter Manager for multiple clusters
APIYes. REST, EC2-compatible, TerraformREST API
Network securityYes. eBPF security groups and microsegmentationFirewall and SDN features
Migration from ProxmoxYes. Transiva has a Proxmox provider; h2kvm converts disks and GuestKit fixes the guestN/A
CostYes. Per-host subscriptionFree; optional support subscriptions

Status: Yes = shipped; Partial = part of the capability ships; Planned = on the roadmap, not available; No = not offered. Each statement traces to the claims ledger.

Choose Machina when

  • You need a fleet view, audit trail and an EC2 API.
  • You want AI-assisted operations with approvals.

Choose Proxmox VE when

  • You want the lowest cost and a large community.
  • You rely on LXC or integrated ZFS/Ceph.

Test it on your own workload

The 30-day evaluation runs on one host and is the only comparison that counts.

Proxmox is a trademark of Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH. The Proxmox VE column reflects public documentation at the time of writing; check the vendor's current documentation and pricing before you decide.